Building Passport: Leading the Digital Revolution for Building Safety
January 13, 2025Why Are Design Drawings Getting Worse?
Igor
Goriatchev, owner of ESD Solutions explains more
Over the last couple of years, the
sad truth has come to light, observed by professionals at every level of the
construction industry: today’s construction drawings simply are not what they
used to be.
Comprehensive, integrated drawings
have given way to incomplete, conflicting, and fragmented sets. This is
frustrating for those working out in the field and affects the efficiency and
quality of projects from start to finish.
For a sense of what’s driving this
change, we reached out to experts from the various corners of the construction
world: architects, engineers, steel detailers, and project managers. Here’s
what they said regarding why quality is slipping and what might have been done
to fix it:
1. Loss of Practical Skills & Hands-On Knowledge
There’s no getting away from it:
technology has changed how we all work, but it’s also changed the skillset
needed to create the construction drawings. Today’s design teams might be sharp
on software, but they often lack practical experience in construction.
Gone are the days when people used
to work their way up, learning the nuts and bolts of construction before moving
into design roles. Nowadays, most team members come directly from schools with
technical skills but without field experience.
This shift suggests that drawings
may look polished, but they do not consider practical challenges arising
on-site. The slip-up occurs in the small, crucial details, bringing about many
avoidable problems on-site.
“We’re seeing design teams that know the
software but are out of touch with the realities of construction. This
disconnect creates designs that work on paper but can fall apart on-site.”
-
Structural and Mechanical Designer, United Kingdom
2. Over-reliance on Automation and BIM Tool
Automation was brought in to make
the design process smoother; however, its unwanted side effect has been a lack
of critical thinking when it comes to drafting. Taking view creation as an
example, automation can drive technically correct drawings that may miss the
big picture.
Other professionals in the field
argue that perhaps we rely too much on automation while creating drawings that
are not always real-world need-sensitive.
Yet, BIM can also be a huge
crutch. Without a proper construction-practice foundation, the drawings often
become muddled when using such potent software, and misunderstandings occur in
the field. For a long time, competent pros could catch this. As these
professionals become more scarce, mistakes are making it through.
“Automation has made the design process
faster, but at the cost of accuracy and context. We’re relying on software to
do the thinking for us, which often backfires.”
-
Project Manager, Canada
3. Speed vs. Quality
The construction industry moves a
lot faster today, and with firmer deadlines, teams are being pushed to complete
more in less time than to take their sweet time. When designers and detailers
race against time, the quality of drawings suffers.
Modeling on such a rushed timeline
may lack review and check details in which mistakes are caught. These mistakes
then appear on site when the work actually starts.
Key information that otherwise may
have been checked to meet a deadline is skimmed over, leading to costly rework
or delays. Many business professionals feel this frenetic pace is hurting the
quality of projects at every level.
“Constant deadlines mean teams are churning
out ‘half-baked’ drawings that look complete but lack the detail needed for
construction. Quality is sacrificed in the name of meeting deadlines.”
-
Project Designer, United States
4. Remote Work and the Loss of In-Person Mentorship
While the rise of remote and
hybrid working has brought many benefits, it’s also changed how we receive
training and mentorship.
Gone are the days when junior
members of a team learned on the job, receiving feedback straight from
experienced colleagues. Remote working has given way to online meetings and
emails, none of which can replicate the same learning experience as face-to-face
mentorship.
Without that daily interaction,
most junior designers never had the opportunity to acquire the practical
knowledge that would have made their drawings accurate. The result is drawings
devoid of the depth and cohesion they previously had.
“Remote work has cut back on the
in-person learning that kept drawing quality high. When juniors aren’t learning
from seniors, the overall quality of work goes down.”
-
Senior Project Manager, Australia
5. Budget Cuts and the Push for “Cheaper, Faster”
As costs rise, several clients
seek lower design fees. When budgets are cut short, quality is mostly
sacrificed. Less time, fewer resources, and much pressure affect drawing
quality.
Many say, “You get what you pay
for,” as reduced fees result in rushed, incomplete, or inconsistent drawings.
Budget cuts also cut down on the
time available for quality control. In order to deliver results fast and
cheaply, there is pressure to override key checks that leave incomplete or
error-riddled drawings.
“When clients push for lower fees,
it almost always means cutting down on quality. Rushed, inconsistent drawings
are the result.”
-
Principal Architect & CEO,
United Arab Emirates
6. Communication Gaps in Global Teams
With projects increasingly
becoming international, communication has become easier and more complicated.
While technology allows various teams worldwide to share a single project, it
does throw up some new challenges.
Such obstacles include language
barriers and cultural differences that may result in misinterpretations and
inconsistencies in drawings. Inconsistencies in different standards and methods
of drafting in different countries add more twists, making the alignment of
documents difficult or impossible.
Many professionals’ challenges
include imparting communication and ensuring everyone is on the same page
regarding quality expectations.
Quality suffers greatly when there
is no consistent communication and coordination regarding making drawings.
“International projects are
struggling with communication gaps that lead to inconsistent drawings.
Different standards and language barriers make it hard to maintain a uniform
quality.”
-
Structural Engineer, Finland
7. “Just Get It Done” Mentality
The industry is increasingly
leaning toward a “just make it work” perspective, where teams are forced to
deliver projects without having nailed down all of the details.
Unfortunately, this results in
incomplete drawings being rushed out the door to meet deadlines, followed by
endless RFIs from the field.
Instead of thorough, coordinated
models, we’re left with drawings that require additional clarification on-site,
slowing down progress and adding costs.
Understandably, there is a rush to
deliver, but when those crucial little details get left by the wayside, it
costs more later on. Many in the industry argue that projects would run
smoother and go easier if the teams would just put in more time to get things
right at the design phase.
“The ‘just get it done’ mindset
leads to mistakes and delays because essential details are ignored. The rush to
finish ends up costing more time and money.”
-
Architect & Interior Designer,
Russia
What Needs to Change?
It’s clear that the quality of
construction drawings is being impacted by a mix of factors: over-dependence on
automation, a loss of practical knowledge, budget pressures, and the unique
challenges of global teams.
These issues can make it tough for
construction teams to work efficiently, and ultimately, they impact the end
quality of projects.
More investment in training by the
industry, realistic timelines, and a higher emphasis on communication and
mentorship will do a lot of good if we want to improve.
By addressing these challenges
head-on, we can bring back the quality and precision that used to be the
standard in construction documentation.
What are your thoughts? Have you
seen these issues in your own projects? And what steps do you think the
industry needs to take to improve the quality of the design?
You must be logged in to view this content.